Following the misguided actions of a U.S. judge in Utah, four federal judges in the states of Oklahoma, Virginia, Kentucky, and Texas, have decided that these states’ laws, affirming marriage as being between one man and one woman, are somehow unconstitutional. The fact is, our federal constitution doesn’t even have the word “marriage” in it. The private opinions of these activist judges are irrelevant and their public rulings have violated states’ rights and neutered natural marriage.
The individual rights mentioned in the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution are not about sex or marriage at all. SaveCalifornia.Com documents that, ”The Equal Protection Clause in no way requires the recognition of same-sex “marriages” because homosexual couples are not the same as heterosexual couples. They cannot have a conjugal union that produces children, and one of the primary purposes of marriage is to bind together fathers and mothers for the benefit of the children they bring into the world.”
Further, the 10th Amendment recognizes states’ rights in matters not delegated in the founding document. While Article IV guarantees a government where our written constitution is to be consented to, as the supreme law.
Many state constitutions, recognizing the unnatural and unhealthy realities of other forms of human relationships, have formally affirmed the societal values of natural marriage.
See more documentation here.